Toby Samuel vs Timofei Derepasko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do their second serve performances compare? Samuel outshines Derepasko by winning 46.59% of points on his second serve, as opposed to Derepasko's 41.25%.
• Who exhibits stronger return games? Derepasko has a slight edge, claiming 49.2% of opponents' second serve points, while Samuel secures 48.53%.
• What is the impact of pressure situations like breakpoints? Derepasko is more adept, saving 55.22% of breakpoints compared to Samuel’s 48.39%.
• Examining overall match performance over the past year, Samuel holds a win ratio of 66.67%, slightly higher than Derepasko’s 63.16%.
• What surfaces suit each player best? Derepasko excels on Hard courts with a 61% win rate, while Clay courts are more favorable for Samuel, achieving a 75% success rate.
• Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments. Samuel has a winning percentage of 72.73%, versus Derepasko’s 63.16%.
• Against what level of opponents do these players usually compete? Derepasko faces slightly more competitive opponents with an average rank of 334.58, as opposed to Samuel's 365.95.
• If it comes down to a deciding set, Derepasko has a stellar 75% win record, while Samuel struggles, winning only 40% of deciders.
• How do they compare in breakpoint opportunities? Both players have similar effectiveness, with Derepasko converting 30.3% and Samuel 30.56% of breakpoints.

Editorial Prediction (September 13, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match between Derepasko and Samuel sizzles with potential. Each player showcases distinct strengths that could heavily influence the outcome.

Samuel’s superior second serve performance suggests an ability to dictate points more effectively, posing a significant challenge for Derepasko. Conversely, Derepasko's advantage in returning opponents' serves, particularly on second serves, could tilt the scales in his favor.

Absorbing pressure seems to come naturally for Derepasko, saving more breakpoints than Samuel. This resilience under pressure might become crucial in pivotal instances during the match.

The players’ track record in deciding sets further bolsters confidence in Derepasko, who displays remarkable resilience, winning the majority of such high-stakes scenarios.

Overall, while both players bring strengths to the court, analytical insights suggest Derepasko holds a slight edge. His proficiency in high-pressure moments and ability to capitalize on return points, aligned with historical performance under tense conditions, makes Derepasko the favored contender in this matchup.